The Fallacies of Virology and the Inversion of Natural Health – The Pasteurian Paradigm Still Fails to Deliver
This article was originally published by Patricia Harrity at The Daily Exposé.
A profit-driven pharmaceutical perspective of health has dominated since the nineteenth century and the days of Louis Pasteur (1822–1895), and Antoine Béchamp (1816–1908) who were scientific contemporaries, compatriots, and fellow members of the French Academy of Science. However, their views on biology and disease pathology led to a prolonged rivalry both within and outside of the Academy.
Pasteur however, had political connections, including Emperor Napoleon III, and was to achieve fame and fortune largely because his views “were in tune with the science and the politics of his day, which is not dissimilar to the brand of “science” that we see accepted by the mainstream today.
Reportedly Pasteur was not above “plagiarising and distorting” the “more brilliant thinker, Béchamp’s research, mainstream medical historians relegated Béchamp’s ideas—not as attractive to conventional thinkers—to the intellectual dustbin, according to Dr. Robert Young, leaving the Pasteur promoted theory to remain dear to the pharmaceutical companies executives hearts, (and wallets).
This theory of course is known as the “Germ Theory which has laid the groundwork for “synthetic drugs, chemotherapy, radiation, surgical removal of body parts and vaccines” to become the “medicine[s] of choice.” Source
The theory promoted the unshakeable belief that there is one microbe for every illness and it is so ingrained as the “controlling medical idea for the Western world” that competing ideas about disease causation still have difficulty gaining traction. according to the author of the book “The Curse of Louis Pasteur ” Dr. Nancy Appleton, who argues that the “theory has overpowered other ideas about the origins and development of disease.”
This is despite the fact that even in the first two decades of the 21st century, dismal national and international health statistics utterly belie the hype about “medical advances.” Most healthcare dollars spent in the U.S. (86 percent) are for patients with at least one chronic condition and similar trends are on the rise around the world according to research With the shocking state of ill health, we cannot afford to let the profit-driven pharmaceutical perspective continue to dominate.
As one writer more bluntly puts it “For those who are able to steel themselves against medical propaganda, it is abundantly clear that the Pasteurian paradigm has failed to deliver.” Not only has it failed to deliver, but has proven to be detrimental to us all time and again as we have witnessed during the Covid plandemic and the constant fearmongering and threats of “variants” showing that “The sooner we get over the legacy of Pasteur’s fake science and get back to reality the better.” (Source).
For now, the Pasteurian “science” still continues to overpower not only other ideas but also rational thinking…..
Source
Greg Reese discusses how the political ideology that was to steer the scientific ideas of the nineteenth century still manages to create a world of chaos and discord.
The Fallacies of Virology and the Inversion of Natural Health
Transcript
Germ theory -vs- Terrain theory.
Isolation means the separation of one thing from everything else. This is the only way to scientifically identify a thing. This is done with everything from large organic material to the smallest nano-particles. It is done with Gold and Silver. And it is done in basic chemistry, but it has never been done with a virus. Several have claimed to have done so, but have since been exposed as frauds. And today, virologists claim that isolation is not possible because of the obligate intracellular nature of a virus. This means that they cannot exist outside of a living cell. But if this were true, then it would also be true that they can not spread from one person to another. The pseudo-science of virology is full of logical fallacies that any inquisitive person can recognize.
Scientific studies require a control group. Meaning that two samples are needed where every factor is the same except for the presence of the thing being studied. But this can not be done in virology because a virus has never been isolated. When virologists claim they are isolating it, they are lying. This is evident today with the latest so-called proof that SARS-CoV-2 has been isolated.
In both the “Isolation and rapid sharing of the 2019 novel coronavirus” published by the Medical Journal of Australia. And in the “Viral isolation analysis of SARS-CoV-2” from Japan’s Journal of Infection and Chemotherapy, the titles suggest that they isolated a virus. But they clearly did not.
They took material from the most contaminated source possible, the nose, which acts as a filter by capturing particulates inhaled from the environment. And at no point did they isolate a virus from this sample. What they did was run the entire mix of unknown material through a PCR test, and claimed that it tested positive for SARS-CoV-2. But we know that the PCR test is not capable of isolating a virus, and we know it’s been deliberately adjusted to give false positive results. So this is not science, it is fraud.
They then inoculated a culture of cells with the entire mix of nose material, added in unspecified material, and the cells died. At no point in these experiments was a virus ever isolated. They in fact did the opposite of isolation by adding foreign material to a mix of unknown material from a person’s nose. So even if the cells died as a result, there is no way of knowing what killed them.
There is an alternative theory that does not have massive funding from spurious foundations and Nobel Peace prizes to convince the public of its validity.
Terrain theory tells us that most of what we are told is a disease, is nothing more than the symptoms of a natural bodily process of healing and repairing tissues damaged from stress and external toxins. Cells naturally die and break down in a way that is identical to how virologists claim a virus behaves. And the very same foundations pushing the theory of the virus, have been simultaneously creating a more toxic world with petrochemical drugs that earn billions in profits. There are far more so-called diseases today than existed before this pseudo-science was unleashed on society.
In 1859 Florence Nightingale published, Notes on Nursing, where in she wrote that “all disease… is more or less a reparative process… an effort of nature to remedy a process of poisoning or of decay, which has taken place… sometimes years beforehand.” She is saying that what we are told today are symptoms of a disease, are actually natural processes of the body healing itself from damage.
Manly P Hall, known best for his 1928 publication, The Secret Teachings of All Ages, gave a lecture in 1989 called, Magnetic Fields of the Human Body. In this lecture he described this same sentiment.
He said that each human body is surrounded by its own magnetic field which provides tremendous protection. And as long as the individual takes proper care of this magnetic field, it will heal all wounds and recover all bodily functions and organs. He said that the law of the energy field is also the law of integrity. When we break the laws of nature, we damage this flow, which in turn damages the individual’s vitality. This magnetic field can be damaged by negative attitudes such as fear, and destructive attitudes towards others. It can be damaged by drugs and alcohol, toxic substances, and any action contrary to the common good.
He went on to say that in ancient times looking upon objects perfect and complete in structure was therapeutic because looking upon them inspired an acceptance of perfect symmetry that positively effects our energy field. And conversely, when we accept discord as inevitable, our energy field is damaged.
For the past hundred years, the same families and foundations have created a world of chaos and discord. And perhaps Terrain’s theory is correct, and the ancients were right, and we have been given a perfect divine vessel that will protect us so long as we look after it and live in accordance with the common good.
Sources:
Greg Reese – Reese Report
Merinda Teller, MPH, PHD
Read the full article here