Your #1 source for blades and firearms news and updates…

  • Home
  • Knives
  • News
  • Hunting
  • Tactical
  • Prepping & Survival
  • Videos
Subscribe
Font ResizerAa
Blade ShopperBlade Shopper
  • News
  • Knives
  • Prepping & Survival
  • Tactical
  • Hunting
  • Videos
Search
  • Home
  • Knives
  • News
  • Hunting
  • Tactical
  • Prepping & Survival
  • Videos
banner
Create an Amazing Newspaper
Discover thousands of options, easy to customize layouts, one-click to import demo and much more.
Learn More

Stay Updated

Get the latest headlines, discounts for the military community, and guides to maximizing your benefits
Subscribe

Explore

  • Photo of The Day
  • Opinion
  • Today's Epaper
  • Trending News
  • Weekly Newsletter
  • Special Deals
Home » Colorado’s Wolf Reintroduction Has Cost Taxpayers Double What They Expected When They Voted to Approve it

Colorado’s Wolf Reintroduction Has Cost Taxpayers Double What They Expected When They Voted to Approve it

Adam Green By Adam Green November 5, 2024 3 Min Read
Share
Colorado’s Wolf Reintroduction Has Cost Taxpayers Double What They Expected When They Voted to Approve it

Bringing wolves back to Colorado has cost the state at least $4.8 million so far, according to a new financial analysis by The Denver Post. This is within the total amount appropriated by lawmakers, the Post reports. But it’s more than double the estimate that was given to Colorado voters during the 2020 election, when voters narrowly passed a ballot measure initiating wolf reintroduction by a margin of less than 1 percent.

The Post’s analysis is based on a spending spreadsheet from Colorado Parks and Wildlife that was obtained through a public records request. The document breaks down all the expenses associated with CPW’s wolf reintroduction program, including the high cost of transporting and surveilling gray wolves.

The spreadsheet also shows how much money was poured into planning and developing a program, along with the high administrative costs of wolf reintroduction. This includes roughly $2.6 million in salaries, benefits, and wages for CPW employees working on wolf-related issues. Other big-ticket items highlighted by Post include more than half-a-million ($525,276) that CPW paid to contractors who helped develop a wolf recovery plan and hosted public meetings, and more than $160,000 in travel-related expenses.

Read Next: Colorado Wolf Pack Captured and Relocated to “Secure Enclosure” Following Conflicts with Ranchers

Funding for the multi-million-dollar wolf reintroduction program comes from a few different coffers managed by the state. Although the original ballot measure called for the program to be funded entirely with CPW’s wildlife cash fund, which is primarily funded by hunting and fishing license fees, state lawmakers argued that it was unfair for hunters and anglers to foot the bill for wolf reintroduction. Their solution was to spread those costs between the state’s general fund, the Species Conservation Trust fund, and the Colorado Nongame Conservation and Wildlife Restoration cash fund.

These costs, of course, will continue to balloon as CPW reintroduces more wolves in the months and years to come. The next release is scheduled to take place between December and March of 2025. And many Coloradans would argue that it’s the ranchers and livestock producers who have incurred the greatest cost for wolf reintroduction. However, the real financial impact of wolves depredating livestock remains unclear. 

So far in 2024, CPW has only paid $3,855 to ranchers for claims that were submitted for two calves and one llama, according to the agency’s records. But those same records show an additional 15 head of cattle and nine sheep that were confirmed to have been killed by Colorado wolves this year. The Post reports that none of those claims have been submitted to the agency, and that ranchers have the option of filing a reimbursement claim immediately or waiting until Dec. 31 to file their claim.  

Read the full article here

Share This Article
Facebook X Copy Link Print
Previous Article What You Probably Don’t Consider When Deciding To Start Carrying What You Probably Don’t Consider When Deciding To Start Carrying
Next Article Echolocation by Sage Marshall Echolocation by Sage Marshall
Leave a Comment Leave a Comment

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Wake up with our popular morning roundup of the day's top blades, firearms and survavial news and updates.

Trump: Barack Obama Is “Guilty of Treason”

July 23, 2025

TrailRecon Reveals Personal Story and Land Cruiser Build Featuring KC’s New Revolutionary Platform One™ Roof Rack

July 23, 2025

We Tested the CZ Shadow 2 Carry, Your Next EDC Gun

July 23, 2025

SHARPENING PROBLEMS AND HOW TO SOLVE

July 23, 2025

Holster Review: Safariland 6354 RDSO For Walther PDP ACRO Professional

July 23, 2025

You Might Also Like

It Should’ve Been the Best Mallard Hunt of Our Lives. Instead, We Almost Died

It Should’ve Been the Best Mallard Hunt of Our Lives. Instead, We Almost Died

Hunting
Anglers Disqualified from Tournament Say Mandatory Polygraphs Are B.S.

Anglers Disqualified from Tournament Say Mandatory Polygraphs Are B.S.

Hunting
11-Year-Old Lands 13-Pound Bass, Makes Texas History

11-Year-Old Lands 13-Pound Bass, Makes Texas History

Hunting
Dunstan Chestnuts: The Ultimate Food Plot

Dunstan Chestnuts: The Ultimate Food Plot

Hunting

2025 © Blade Shopper. All rights reserved.

Helpful Links

  • News
  • Knives
  • Prepping & Survival
  • Tactical
  • Hunting
  • Videos

Resources

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of use
  • Press Release
  • Advertise
  • Contact

Popuplar

Trump: Barack Obama Is “Guilty of Treason”
Everything You Need to Know About Joining the Air Force
Bournemouth Air Festival: The UK’s Largest Air Festival
We provide daily defense news, benefits information, veteran employment resources, spouse and family resources.
Welcome Back!

Sign in to your account

Username or Email Address
Password

Lost your password?