EPA Confirms Existence of GEOENGINEERING Programs, Validating Long-Held Public Concerns

This article was originally published by Ava Grace at Natural News. 

• • The U.S. EPA officially confirmed the existence of government-backed geoengineering programs, reversing years of denial. Administrator Lee Zeldin announced a transparency initiative detailing solar radiation modification (SRM) and its risks.

• • SRM involves injecting reflective particles (e.g., sulfur dioxide) to cool the planet, but the EPA warns it may harm the ozone layer, disrupt weather, damage crops, and cause acid rain. Neurological risks, like Alzheimer’s and Parkinson’s, are also linked to nano-aluminum particles from atmospheric spraying.

• • The EPA admitted tracking private actors engaged in geoengineering, suggesting undisclosed corporate or international programs. Weather modification techniques like cloud seeding (using silver iodide) were also confirmed.

• • The disclosure sparked debate, with some lawmakers pushing for bans while critics dismissed extreme weather links. Skeptics argue the move distracts from broader climate policy failures, blurring lines between fact and conspiracy theories.

• • The admission raises concerns about undisclosed programs and long-term consequences. While the EPA denies large-scale SRM operations, public distrust persists, leaving citizens to navigate potential health and environmental risks. The era of denial has ended, but the full impact remains uncertain.

In a dramatic shift, the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has officially acknowledged the existence of government-backed geoengineering programs – a revelation that confirms what skeptics and concerned citizens have alleged for decades.

On Thursday, July 16, EPA Administrator Lee Zeldin announced the agency’s new transparency initiative. The agency published detailed resources on geoengineering and contrails while admitting the potential dangers of such programs. The EPA’s admission marks a stunning reversal from years of official denial and ridicule directed at those who questioned the unnatural patterns in the skies above them.

For years, Americans who pointed to persistent white trails crisscrossing the atmosphere were dismissed as conspiracy theorists. Now, the EPA has conceded that geoengineering – specifically, solar radiation modification (SRM) – is not only real but poses serious environmental and health risks.

The agency’s new webpage details how SRM involves injecting reflective particles like sulfur dioxide into the upper atmosphere to cool the planet by bouncing sunlight back into space. While framed as a potential climate solution, the EPA now warns these programs could deplete the ozone layer, disrupt weather patterns, damage crops, and even trigger acid rain. (Related: EPA bolsters transparency on geoengineering amid rising tide of “conspiracy theories”.)

Nano-aluminum particles harm people’s brains

Perhaps the most alarming revelation is the potential link between geoengineering and skyrocketing neurological disorders. Retired neurosurgeon Dr. Russell Blaylock has long warned that nano-aluminum particles, commonly found in atmospheric spraying programs, can bypass the body’s natural defenses and accumulate in brain tissue.

Studies suggest these particles may contribute to Alzheimer’s and Parkinson’s disease, conditions that have surged from 200,000 cases in 1979 to over six million today. The EPA’s admission raises urgent questions. Could decades of covert atmospheric experiments be fueling a public health crisis?

The EPA’s disclosure goes further, acknowledging efforts to “identify and track private actors” engaged in geoengineering. This suggests the programs extend beyond government agencies to include undisclosed corporate or international entities.

The agency also confirmed ongoing weather modification efforts such as cloud seeding, a practice used to induce rain by dispersing chemicals like silver iodide. While cloud seeding has been openly used in drought-stricken regions, the broader implications of unchecked atmospheric manipulation remain unsettling.

The EPA’s sudden transparency has ignited fierce debate. Some, like Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene (R-GA), hailed the move as overdue, announcing legislation to ban weather modification outright.

Others, including meteorologists, dismissed claims linking geoengineering to extreme weather as baseless. Meanwhile, critics argue the EPA’s pivot is a political distraction from larger climate policy failures.

The EPA’s admission forces a reckoning. If geoengineering has been underway for years without public consent, what else remains undisclosed? While the agency insists no large-scale SRM programs are active, skeptics question whether this is merely the tip of the iceberg.

For now, the burden falls on citizens to navigate the risks, whether through detoxification strategies, air filtration, or political advocacy. One thing is certain: The era of outright denial is over, and the skies will never look the same again.

ClimateScienceNews.com has more similar stories.

Watch Dane Wigington from Geoengineering Watch warning about heavy metals present in chemtrails in this clip from the “Health Ranger Report.”

This video is from the What is Happening channel on Brighteon.com.